It's a residential street so taking extra care is a given, but yet neither the bike or the car showed any.. especially around a sharp turn. So, equal guilt in negligence for operating each of their vehicles in an unsafe manner is assessed to each. But, since a car is a deadly weapon and a bike is not, the car must hold more of the guilt factor and, therefore, pay out of the gaping, huge hole newly created below once the taint gave in and the butthole and twat joined as one.. I'm assuming the car was a broad. I just feel it in me bones.
That should be legal.
And the owner of the car should be able to sue for damages.
They're both wrong.
It's a residential street so taking extra care is a given, but yet neither the bike or the car showed any.. especially around a sharp turn. So, equal guilt in negligence for operating each of their vehicles in an unsafe manner is assessed to each. But, since a car is a deadly weapon and a bike is not, the car must hold more of the guilt factor and, therefore, pay out of the gaping, huge hole newly created below once the taint gave in and the butthole and twat joined as one.. I'm assuming the car was a broad. I just feel it in me bones.
And also the car for hit and run.
Instead of stopping in the middle of the road, maybe pull over out of danger